421. With Such Perfection Govern: English Political Thought
The evolution of ideas about kingship and the role of the “three estates” in 15th and 16th century England, with a focus on John Fortescue and Thomas Starkey.
Themes:
• D.M. Brodie (ed.), Edmund Dudley: Tree of Commonwealth (Cambridge: 2014).
• S. Lockwood (trans.), Sir John Fortescue: On the Laws and Governance of England (Cambridge: 1997).
• T.F. Mayer (ed.), Thomas Starkey: A Dialogue Between Pole and Lupset (London: 1989).
---
• A.L. Beier, Social Thought in England, 1480-1730 (London: 2016).
• S.A. Chavura, Tudor Protestant Political Thought 1547-1603 (Leiden: 2011).
• S.B. Chrimes, English Constitutional Ideas in the Fifteenth Century (Cambridge: 1936).
• P.A Fideler and T.F. Mayer (eds), Political Thought and the Tudor Commonwealth: Deep Structure, Discourse and Disguise (London: 1992).
• S. Hindle, The State and Social Change in England, 1550-1640 (Basingstoke: 2000).
• W.R.D. Jones, The Tudor Commonwealth 1529-1559 (London: 1970).
• T.F. Mayer, Thomas Starkey and the Commonweal: Humanist Politics and Religion in the Reign of Henry VIII (Cambridge: 1989).
• M. Peltonen, Classical Humanism and Republicanism in English Political Thought, 1570-1640 (Cambridge: 1995).
• J. Woolfson, “Between Bruni and Hobbes: Aristotle’s Politics in Tudor Intellectual Culture,” in J. Woolfson (ed.), Reassessing Tudor Humanism (Houndsmills: 2002), 197-222.
Comments
British Scholasticism
Hi, Will we have an episode on British scholasticism?
In reply to British Scholasticism by mehmet
British scholasticism
Indeed we will! It will focus especially on John Mair, I think, but also look at John Case for instance. This is scheduled to come along in autumn after a mini-series on British literature, in which several themes will be pursued in connection with Shakespeare's plays (e.g. witchcraft and Macbeth).
In reply to British scholasticism by Peter Adamson
Whew!! That's good news.. I…
Whew!! That's good news.. I thought we would skip it..
In reply to British Scholasticism by mehmet
For your convenience
WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN YOU'RE EXPECTING THE BRITISH REFORMATION
Mehmet, Peter has kindly and helpfully provided a preview at:
https://historyofphilosophy.net/what-expect-when-youre-expecting-britis…
In reply to For your convenience by Spencer
Thanks a lot. I have missed…
Thanks a lot. I have missed that post. It seems that the scope is somewhat expanded compared to https://historyofphilosophy.net/what-expect-when-youre-expecting-britis…, which is good news.
In reply to Thanks a lot. I have missed… by mehmet
Scope
Oh yes quite a bit actually - the next episode is on Hooker, something I hadn't originally planned on, and there will be more Shakespeare than originally advertised.
Theme of Law missing as a tag
I've noticed that you forgot to include the theme of Law as part of this episode. Your last episode as part of the Western tradition to have this theme was episode 316 (Byzantine era).
https://historyofphilosophy.net/themes/law
Following episodes that should also have the theme of law but weren't
https://historyofphilosophy.net/bodin
https://historyofphilosophy.net/thomas-more
https://historyofphilosophy.net/richard-hooker
https://historyofphilosophy.net/huguenots
https://historyofphilosophy.net/renaissance-history
https://historyofphilosophy.net/machiavelli-republicanism
https://historyofphilosophy.net/machiavelli
https://historyofphilosophy.net/machiavelli-skinner
https://historyofphilosophy.net/republicanism-civic-humanism
In reply to Theme of Law missing as a tag by dukeofethereal
Law tag
Thanks, you are paying more attention to my podcast than I am myself! I'll add those. To be honest I think I sort of forgot I had set this up as a theme.
Robert Stillington
Hello Peter, which of the references shown here are the one to investigate more on robert stillington Bishop of bath 1467 quote on "justice"? I found this an interesting sermon, and would like to read some further.
In reply to Robert Stillington by Dave Lavery
Stillington
I got that from S.B. Chrimes, English Constitutional Ideas in the Fifteenth Century (Cambridge: 1936), 121. Interesting passage!
Add new comment