Skip to main content
Posted on: 10 December 2017

Dignāga argues that all perception is accompanied by self-awareness.

775 views
Posted on: 03 December 2017

Martin Pickavé returns to the podcast to talk about theories of the emotions in Aquinas, Scotus and Wodeham.

1,290 views
1 comments
Posted on: 26 November 2017

Graham Priest joins Peter to discuss non-classical logic and its connections with Buddhist patterns of reasoning.

3,596 views
5 comments
Posted on: 19 November 2017

Be surprised by how many philosophical problems arise in connection with angels (how many can dance on the head of a pin is not one of them).

3,201 views
2 comments
Posted on: 12 November 2017

Dignāga’s trairūpya theory, which sets out the three conditions required for making reliable inferences.

1,715 views
Posted on: 05 November 2017

Dietrich of Freiberg, Berthold of Moosburg, John Tauler and Henry Suso explore Neoplatonism and mysticism.

2,775 views
2 comments
Posted on: 29 October 2017

The great Buddhist thinker Dignāga argues that general concepts and language are mere constructions superimposed on perception.

2,349 views
3 comments
Posted on: 22 October 2017

The scholastic and mystic Meister Eckhart sets out his daring speculations about God and humankind in both Latin and German.

3,509 views
4 comments

Normore on logic and the history of philosophy

I came across this nice interview with Calvin Normore, which includes some ruminations on the history of philosophy that warmed my heart: "there is a way in which a historian of Philosophy has answerable to the discipline of History, but also to the discipline of Philosophy. You have to be doing Philosophy: you can’t even understand the history, typically, unless you do the philosophy well.

Lethem on abundance

I was just reading an essay by the novelist Jonathan Lethem in which he argues against the temptation to canonize only a few great novelists (the "Rushmore" impulse, he calls it), since there are so many other varied fiction writers worth reading. Of course this resonates with the "without any gaps" approach of the podcast. I was particularly struck by the following passage which, if applied to the history of philosophy, expresses better than I ever could my feelings about trying to narrow our focus to a canon of major figures:

Copy editing: ask the audience!

The paperback versions of volumes 2 and 3 of The History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps book series are on the way! So we're talking here about Philosophy in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds; and in the Islamic World. I am allowed to make small corrections - not adding whole chapters or whatever but I can fix little things. I'd be grateful to know if anyone has spotted typos or factual errors in either book.

  • Jim Young
    11 hours 1 min ago

    Graham Priest's mention of Aristotle's weak proofs for the principle of non-contradiction reminds me of Ortega y Gasset's delightful discussion of this in The Idea of Principle in Leibniz. This leads me to wonder if Ortega is on the menu?  

  • Otter Bob
    1 day 19 hours ago

    Hi Peter,

  • John B
    1 day 22 hours ago

    Hello! 

    Great podcast! Do you plan to add a series on Chinese philosophy?  I would personally be interested, and I think it is the most conspicuous gap in the current collection. 

    Thanks! 

  • Shashvat Shukla
    2 days 7 hours ago

    There were many words and names(both Sanskrit and Polish!) mentioned in this episode that were hard to spell from listening to them. Could you please provide show notes with the episodes with the names spelled out!

  • Demetrios
    2 days 20 hours ago

    First, thank you very much for the amazing podcast; I deeply appreciate it and all I've learned.

    In your introduction to Timaeus in this episode, you juxtapose the theology of the revealed religions with the concept of the demiurge. I heard this and immediately thought of the opening chapter of Genesis Rabbah (בראשית רבה), a sixth c. rabbinic work, which begins with the following [you're probably familiar with it, but nonetheless, here's the relevant section with some explanatory notes]:

  • Kieran Boylan
    4 days 17 hours ago

    When is Vol 4 coming out?

  • Xaratustrah
    6 days 1 hour ago

    Hi Peter,

    I am not sure if I understood the position of the Jainas with regard to that of Dignaga or Dharmakirti, for instance in the example of the mango. If I give it a thought, basically only that of Dharmakirti sounds different because it requires an underlying principle, whereas both Jainas and Dignaga basically rely on the past experience, one or the other way. The fact that conjunction of taste and color is enough for Dignaga for a judgement is itself based on past experiences and hence a kind of induction. Isn't it?

    Cheers!

  • Product of my t...
    6 days 17 hours ago

    Again, if you or anyone else can make a good case for moral realism, or demonstrate the existence of moral facts, I'm open to being persuaded. People often argue about who has the burden of proof. My approach to that is to try to give my case as best I can, regardless of who I think bears that burden more.

. The Pre-Socratics you never hear about... :) https://t.co/SKFJk2E9vT
14 hours 19 min ago
Preparing my one-year-old daughter for ... https://t.co/dShG2C4pMI
18 hours 47 min ago
Doors of Perception: Dignāga on Consciousness (audio~18mins) - Indian #philosophy https://t.co/m9LXJtOeun
20 hours 18 min ago
Ibn Rushd, one of the most important Islamic philosophers, died #OnThisDay, December 10, 1198, Marrakesh, Morocco.… https://t.co/rFfpbQfeDn
1 day 4 hours ago
Thanks for these interesting resources - We would love to hear any thoughts… https://t.co/VPX87KMukV
1 day 4 hours ago
Today's new #HoPWaG is now up: Dignaga on consciousness, in which we discover that for him all perception comes wit… https://t.co/AyagGYuyyA
1 day 10 hours ago
RT : Because giraffes. And the history of philosophy question too, of course. But giraffes. #Philosophy #giraffe https://t.co/4WbeexZrSM
1 day 10 hours ago
RT : Peter Adamson's talk at Google is a great introduction to his great podcast and books https://t.co/CZdlZj4LOJ
1 day 10 hours ago
RT : Magnifique manuscrit du Coran sur toile enroulée, à zoomer, Xe/XVIe siècle, musée Salal Jung, Hyderabad, Inde. https://t.co/KQvslSZoFB
1 day 10 hours ago
Peter Adamson's talk at Google is a great introduction to his great podcast and books https://t.co/CZdlZj4LOJ
1 day 16 hours ago
1 day 19 hours ago
Indeed. We should talk!
1 day 21 hours ago
Lots to think about there...may be worth exploring!!
1 day 21 hours ago
If you ever want to explore something like that more formally, I would definitely be up for that!
1 day 21 hours ago
I absolutely love the idea of transactive imagination systems!
1 day 21 hours ago
Of course, I would quickly add, that I certainly don't think *any* instantition of… https://t.co/YNuxtHHZxy
1 day 21 hours ago
My bet is that those distinction x-cut one another. Collective practice can be conser… https://t.co/MbCUtDvFcD
1 day 21 hours ago
Trying to make a distinction, maybe, between philosophical practice that is more co… https://t.co/f24O8Cr4ok
1 day 21 hours ago
That does make sense. And it points out, perhaps, an important distinction between… https://t.co/zNM7IiBzov
1 day 22 hours ago
In many traditions, there’s a serious multiple-drafts problem. Maybe someone writes i… https://t.co/goaK3OzjIr
1 day 22 hours ago
That's an interesting perspective. But the articulation and elaboration of ideas an… https://t.co/cnYs0PZITB
1 day 22 hours ago
RT : HEY NEW YORKERS! You will have an exciting and rare opportunity to meet 18th-Century Philosopher Jeremy Bentham Wh… https://t.co/9xAaoWAPnN
2 days 1 hour ago
Yes, I loved the question because I also think the answer is "no" and it was fun explaining all the reasons why!
2 days 1 hour ago
RT : I hope the answer is “no”. There are great philosophers in many traditions, but a great deal… https://t.co/WIKnUZgwdu
2 days 1 hour ago
Via a collage by the artist Lenore Tawney, who was also influenced by Kashmir Shaivism. I reckon she… https://t.co/G21J4akUHm
2 days 1 hour ago
I hope the answer is “no”. There are great philosophers in many traditions, but a great deal… https://t.co/WIKnUZgwdu
2 days 2 hours ago
I meet fellow podcasters from "We Need to Talk" () on this new episode of their series. We discuss the import… https://t.co/YfNrwQVRJO
2 days 2 hours ago
RT : Out Sunday! Our highly anticipated discussion with , 'Episode 29, Stephen Law and The Evil-God Challen… https://t.co/YQLrD1pQQd
2 days 5 hours ago
RT : Adventures in alchemy Germany, 15thc Sloane 2560 https://t.co/CsjG0pLLmh
2 days 8 hours ago

Views:

5932255

Overview

Peter Adamson, Professor of Philosophy at the LMU in Munich and at King's College London, takes listeners through the history of philosophy, "without any gaps." The series looks at the ideas, lives and historical context of the major philosophers as well as the lesser-known figures of the tradition. 

Buy the book versions:

Philosophy in the Islamic World

subscribe

The latest episodes are listed on the left, or you can view the list of all episodes published so far. If you want to keep up to date with the latest podcasts, you can subscribe to the latest episodes RSS feed or to email notification (via Google Feedburner) that there is a new podcast.

RSS feed - example zip file - exampletorrent file - example

Series of podcast episodes (MP3 files) are grouped together as RSS feeds (requiring an RSS reader such as Feedly or a podcatcher such as Podkicker for Android), zip files (requring a zip tool such as 7-zip to unzip the downloaded file) and bit torrent files (requiring a bit torrent client such as µTorrent to open the downloaded file.) 

You can leave a comment on any of the individual podcasts, on the website as a whole or on Peter's blog.