33 - Last Judgments: Plato, Poetry and Myth

Plato criticized both the epic poetry of Homer and Hesiod, and the tragic and comic poets. Yet he invented myths of his own. So what was his attitude towards literature and myth? Peter tackles this question in a final episode on Plato.

Press 'play' to hear the podcast: 

You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.

Further Reading: 

• J. Annas, “Plato’s Myths of Judgement”, Phronesis 27 (1982), 119-43.

• G.R. Boys-Stones and J.H. Haubold (eds), Plato and Hesiod (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).

• D. O’Connor, “Rewriting the Poets in Plato’s Characters,” in The Cambridge Companion to the Republic, ed. G.R.F. Ferrari (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 55-89.

• C. Partenie (ed.), Plato: Selected Myths (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).

• C. Partenie (ed.), Plato’s Myths (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).

Philosopher's Zone podcast: Plato on Myth

 

Steadfast's picture

Cause

And so we get to the end of Plato - but before we leave Peter can you go back a bit to the term you used discussing Forms that the Form of largeness 'caused' largeness in Hiawatha the boy named girl giraffe. As a transitive verb 'cause' suggests that the Form has generative power to effect the 'largeness' rather than that Hiawatha, being large, is by coincidence reflecting a 'Form-al' universal property.

Peter Adamson's picture

Forms as causes

Yes, Plato definitely talks about Forms as causes, and so do figures in the later Platonist tradition (as detailed in the later episodes). The dialogue where he really makes this clear is the Phaedo, also the beginning of the Parmenides though there he is raising problems about whether Forms actually could be causes (among other problems). I talk about the issue a fair amount in teh Phaedo episode, I seem to remember. In any case you're right that Hiawatha is supposedly made to be large by the Form, and not just resembling the Form by virtue of being large (though that may also be true). This doesn't necessarily rule out the involvement of other causes though, the ones that Plato calls "clever" causes in the Phaedo.

Thorwald C. Franke's picture

Interpretation of Plato's myths still not convincing

The usual interpretation of Plato's myths is still not convincing. It begins with a clear lack of distinction between traditional myths and Plato's myths. It continues with the puzzling fact that Plato (resp. his Socrates) believes in some of his myths, but in some others rather not. And it ends with the myth of Atlantis, which is only called a myth by modern scholars, whereas Plato himself talks of it as a logos, clearly not a myth in his sense - although the story of Atlantis is somehow constructed like one of Plato's major myths. Hm. I especially have the strong feeling that the whole concept of Platonic myth is biased by the will to define the story of Atlantis to be a myth instead of a distorted historical tradition (it is literally not true, this is clear). If we omitted the story of Atlantis, the picture would become much more easy, and some exaggerated assumptions would be unnecessary. I am working on this. The problem is: The picture becomes fine only, if Atlantis is indeed no myth. Finding Atlantis ... :-)